One-Pagers

Today there seems to be a market for books that accommodate to a group of people I’d call “one-pagers.” Namely people who only read the first page of a book and then decide to toss it away or read through it. One page. That’s around 240-250 words or so. When I first read J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, I read the first 100 pages that were unbelievably boring, but after that, I was hooked, and it turned out to become one of my favorite books ever. If I had wallbanged it after the first page, I would’ve never gotten to enjoy the abundance of amazing art that followed the first 100 pages.

Maybe I’m just reluctant to let go of the ideal that readers would be patient enough to at least read a few pages, and I’m likewise reluctant to start catering for the one-pagers when I remember myself how tedious it could be to trudge through the first few pages (or a few dozen) to get to the good stuff, but I also remember how, when it did get good, I was glad to have read the set-up because it gave me perspective I would have otherwise lacked.

Now, I realize Tolkien’s book is by no means contemporary: times have changed, and many people are more and more reluctant to put in the effort to truly understand a piece of art. They want instant gratification, and that’s how we end up with the myriad of artists who decorate the MTV top 10 even though most of them will be forgotten in a few years. Few will be remembered, and even then it is usually those who have been able to somehow separate themselves from the mass of fast-food music, i.e. they did something differently.

I see a similar trend in literature: people want to feel after just one page what I felt with LOTR after 100 pages. They want it all, immediately, not in a moment but right now. But does this force authors to alter their works to fit the demands of the literary equivalent of MTV if they ever want to make writing into a living? Do we, as authors, want to push literature, once a noble art form, to become the proverbial quickie in the back alley? Or should we insist on retaining our vision even if it means fewer one-pagers will like it?

Maybe writers have to adapt to the times as well or get left behind. It’s just that… well, I also write songs for my band, and although our music (a mix of rock, funk, metal, and renaissance music) is a little more on the weird side than Justin Bieber, so far many an audience has liked it. I suppose it’s too weird to ever be mainstream, but I have zero interest in being mainstream if it means I have to turn my vision into something I don’t give two shits about (pardon my ending a sentence with a preposition).

My attitude as a songwriter has been to never, EVER compromise my art to please an audience: I don’t do it for a living, so we don’t need the money, so if someone doesn’t like it, that’s their problem, not mine, I just present my art as it comes from the ether or wherever.

I know, all this stuff about artistic integrity is very cheesy but bear with me: I try to bring that integrity and attitude to writing as well. That’s because when me and K.Trian first started writing, it was just for our own pleasure. And the whole idea stemmed from the fact that we had a hard time finding books we liked, and even when we did, we often felt “well, I would’ve done this bit differently.” So we decided to start writing books we would like to read ourselves. Just like I started my band in order to create music I liked. And to alter our works just to get them to sell more copies… well, I’m not sure if I want to do that.

Again, we don’t write for a living so I suppose not making it big doesn’t really hinder our lives that much, but I believe in what we do, I believe in the stories, truly, so it’s a little difficult to start cultivating the attitude that we have to change the works according to what the public is most likely to like in a given era. I know this may come off as cocky, but that’s not it. I’m just hesitant about altering something in order to make it sell better.

Maybe it IS possible to write a story that grabs the reader from the first sentence onward and never lets go without making it into another Twilight/Fifty Shades of Grey, but I need to take a moment to wonder how to go about that and still have the book be what I want it to be (art-wise).

 

Yours sincerely,

T.Trian

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “One-Pagers

  1. Howdy from AW… I agree, sometimes it necessarily takes a story a while to get going. This obsession with first-pages … well, maybe agents think that way, but I’d hazard that most readers don’t.

    • Yeah, the thing is, we often make the choice by the blurb instead of the beginning. We aren’t “impatient” readers, but then again, neither of us reads all the friggin’ time anyway, so I guess someone who consumes a lot of literature may get pickier with beginnings. Of course we try to have swift beginnings in our stories too, but sometimes they really aren’t nearly as explosive or out-of-this-world as is often recommended. Oh well.

  2. Unfortunately, that’s the norm nowadays. And agents have begun to do the same. I’ve mentioned on my blog that I’m submitting to a literary agency a few times, and they require me to send them the first five pages. The main man of the agency (Donald Maass) has said quite a few times that, “Most agents can figure out if they’ll buy the book or if it’ll sell within the first five pages.”

    So, it’s definitely worrisome for people with books that build up slowly and like a pre-WWII era water heater, explode and have the sheer power of it flood the entire place. Patrick Rothfuss didn’t get published ’till he won a Short story contest with an excerpt from the middle of his first book and got picked up by an agent. Most likely because when submitted, the agency didn’t care for the first five pages. Same with Game of Thrones. Few read it when it came out in the late 90’s.

    Self-publishing is, at the same, great for writers and bad for writers. Since people like Stephanie Meyer -shivers- managed to self-publish her book, and got syndicated and officially published when it became a hit. Same with Amanda Hocking. Err… I think E.L. James pulled the same stunt. Not sure.

    But, there’s also books like Blood Song by Anthony Ryan, which was reviewed by bona fide authors because it was so good and had so many reviews. It was soon picked up by an actual agency (after over 500 reviews on Amazon) and it’ll no doubt be a success.

    Err.. Where am I getting? No idea. But, while One-Pagers won’t die down soon, the concept and idea of space rangers with a cast of ne’er-do-wells sound positively exciting, and considering the success of Game of Thrones, it’ll be a smash.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s